On 28/10/2010 2:24 AM, Nilesh Dhumal wrote:
Thanks a lot.
I made some changes in topology file for rerun simulation.
Still I am getting same potential energy.
If topology files are different then why the potential energy is same?

Occam's razor says that the topologies are not (meaningfully) different. Check your command lines, and compare your .tpr files with gmxcheck.

Mark

Nilesh

On Tue, October 26, 2010 4:29 pm, Mark Abraham wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: Nilesh Dhumal<ndhu...@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 1:04
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] (no subject)
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users<gmx-users@gromacs.org>


I used the same .tpr file. I added  -dlb yes and  -
reprod yes during mdrun with rerun option. Still I am not geting why
energy, temp, pressure are changing since I have same topology file and
.trr file.

As I said last time, a parallel rerun cannot reproduce a run unless
they're both run under the same conditions. Changing the options for the
rerun cannot achieve this, because the original run probably had dynamic
load balancing.

Mark


Is there any bug in rerun option?
Nilesh


On Mon, October 25, 2010 8:50 pm, Mark Abraham wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: Nilesh Dhumal<ndhu...@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 10:50
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] (no subject)
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users<gmx-users@gromacs.org>



I run a test simulation for -rerun. I didn't change the

topology file.

grompp -f md.mdp  -c  solvent-bmi-pf6-128.pdb
- p

solvent-bmi-pf6-128.top -o 3.tpr mpirun -machinefile cp -np 8 mdrun
-s 3.tpr -o 3.trr -c
solvent-bmi-pf6-128.pdb -e 3.edr -g 3.log

with -rerun grompp -f md.mdp  -c  solvent-bmi-pf6-
128.pdb  - p

solvent-bmi-pf6-128.top -o 6.tpr mpirun -machinefile cp -np 8 mdrun
-s 6.tpr -o 6.trr -rerun

3.trr  -c

solvent-bmi-pf6-128.pdb -e 6.edr -g 6.log

I calculate the total energy by
g_energy -f 3.edr -o 3.xvg g_energy -f 6.edr -o 6.xvg

The total energy varies between +- 30.00 KJ/mol.
It should be constant since I using same topology file and

trajectory.>>  Why the total energy is not constant.
Those .tpr should be identical - but you can check that with

gmxcheck.>  Reruns do neighbour-searching every step, whereas your normal
simulation
followed the nstlist setting. That's part of why my earlier advice
suggested doing reruns for each simulation you wish to
compare. You
should be able to get good/better agreement for steps where nstlist
directed neighbour-searching in the original run. Also,
whether or not
constraints have been applied (and when!) could influence the
energies to
about this degree. I don't recall the details here.

Even once you've removed all algorithm-specific sources of

difference,>  there are other sources of non-reproducibility, such as the
assignment of
particles to DD cells. Your original mdrun probably used dynamic
load-balancing, and that cannot be reproduced in the DD used
by the
rerun. (Or indeed by a repeat of your original mdrun!) Setting
-dlb no in

the original simulation might be enough to get agreement here,
or maybe
mdrun -reprod will be required.

Mark



NIlesh






On Thu, October 21, 2010 10:24 am, Mark Abraham wrote:


On 22/10/2010 1:17 AM, Nilesh Dhumal wrote:



I am doing solvation dynamics for my system.
I have system with diatomic (PA---NE)solute surrounded by water
molecules.

I want to run simulation with two differcent cases.
1. PA charge=0 and NE charge=0 : No charge on solute
2. PA charge=+1 and NE charge=-1 : Charge on solute




I want to calculate the energy at each step keeping the solvent
  configration same.

IF I start a simulation with no charge on solute (case1), I


have the
energy for 1 step. I want to calculate the energy with charge
on solute
(case 2) with same configration water molecules.
Each step  I want to calculate the energy with and


without charge on
solute since the configration of solvent will be same for
that step.
I was thinking two make two topologies file with charge and


with out
charge on solute. I don't know how to use them simultaneously
during the
simulation.
Well, you don't use them simultaneously. You run a

simulation on
whatever you think will generate a relevant conformational
ensemble. Then
you want to use mdrun -rerun twice on the resulting
trajectory, using .tpr
files based on .top files corresponding to the two cases in
order to
create your comparison.

Mark
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before

posting!>>>  Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use
the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read


http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists







--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post?

Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read

http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. Can't post?
Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. Can't post? Read
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to