sorry for the incomplete post before, believe it or not my cat was to blame.
I want to write out only the final frames from a set of trr trajectories. This was discussed here with apparently only a workaround: http://www.mail-archive.com/gmx-users@gromacs.org/msg19545.html however intuitively it seems trjconv should do this with the -dump option documented like this: -dump time -1 Dump frame nearest specified time (ps) if I give e.g. -dump 999999 trjconv doesn't do what the description led me to believe but falls off the end with "WARNING no output". Wouldn't it make more sense for trjconv to write out the last frame? Thanks, Floris ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Floris Buelens <floris_buel...@yahoo.com> To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Sent: Mon, 4 October, 2010 11:24:57 Subject: last frame in trr Hi, I want to write out only the final frames from a set of trr trajectories. This was discussed here: however intuitively it seems trjconv should do this with the -dump option documented like this: -dump time -1 Dump frame nearest specified time (ps) if I give e.g. -dump 999999 trjconv doesn't do what the description led me to believe -- gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
