Gavin Melaugh wrote:
Hi Justin

I Did the following and it worked. You were right about using one atom
types directive. If you don't mind I have another query. In all my
topology files to date (one molecule type), I have always listed the
atomtypes in the [atomtypes] directive, and used the set up in
[defaults] below. Is this all that is required for the calculation of
the LJ energies. I have never used a pair list, a pair types directive
or a nonbond_params directive. From the output I still get LJ energies
but I am slightly confused by all the different options.


I can't give a better explanation than what is already in the manual, specifically section 5.3.3 ([nonbond_params] and whether or not you need it). Whether or not you need [pairs] depends on the underlying mechanics of the force field you're using. See section 5.3.5.

-Justin

parameter level
[defaults]
; nbfunc    comb-rule     gen-pairs        fudgeLJ     fudgeQQ
     1         3              yes            0.5         0.5

[atomtypes]
;type mass charge ptype sigma(nm) epsilon(kjmol-1)
   CB     12.011000      0.000000       A      0.355000      0.292880
   CA     12.011000     -0.115000       A      0.355000      0.292880
   HC      1.008000      0.115000       A      0.242000      0.125520
   CU     13.019000      0.265000       A      0.350000      0.334720
   NU     14.007000     -0.597000       A      0.325000      0.711280
   CH     13.019000      0.332000       A      0.385000      0.334720
   C3     15.035000      0.000000       A      0.390500      0.732200
   CT     12.011000     -0.180000       A      0.350000      0.276144
   HH      1.008000      0.060000       A      0.250000      0.125520

#include "tertpentane.itp"
#include "methylcage.itp"

;System level
[system]
;the name of this system
cage and pentane

[molecules]
; moleculename     number
 tertpentane          1
 methylcage           1


Justin A. Lemkul wrote:

Gavin Melaugh wrote:
Hi Justin

Cheers. I have attached my pentane itp file. The cage itp is formatted
the same. In the examples there never seems to be [atom types] included.
I have included it. Does it seem O.K?

You only need to use an [atomtypes] directive if you're introducing
new atom types into the force field. I don't know if it's necessary. I also don't know if these sections can be discontinuous (i.e., one
section present in cage.itp, another in tertpentane.itp).  Try the
approach I sent you and see.  If you get fatal errors, then you may
have to assemble a single [atomtypes] directive and put it either in
the first .itp file you #include, or before any of the #includes in
the .top (since #include really just means "cut-and-paste the stuff
here," it works the same).

-Justin

Gavin

Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
Gavin Melaugh wrote:
Hi Mark.

I have looked this up, but I am a little uncertain. Does one of the
topologies have to be included within the other as an .itp file. If so
No.  You #include .itp files to simply add molecules within a .top; it
would be very rare to #include an .itp within an .itp (although it can
be done).  For your case, your .top is simple:

#include (force field)

#include "cage.itp"
#include "pentane.itp"

[ system ]
My system

[ molecules ]
Cage    1
Pentane 1

do I only define the [defaults directive] in the .top file i.e. I take
it I don't include this directive in the .itp file as well.

The [defaults] directive is provided by whatever force field you
#include.  If you're using some custom parameters, then it needs to be
defined once (and only once) at the top of your .top file.  Otherwise,
you'll get fatal errors from grompp.

-Justin

Cheers

Gavin

Mark Abraham wrote:
Look up the include file mechanism on the webpage.

Mark

----- Original Message -----
From: Gavin Melaugh <gmelaug...@qub.ac.uk>
Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 19:04
Subject: [gmx-users] topology file for two molecules
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users@gromacs.org>

Hi all

I want to run a simulation of one tert-pentane molecule inside one
organic cage molecule. I have the topology files for both
molecules but
obviously I only need one .top file as the input for grompp.
What is the
most convenient way of having both topologies in one file?

Many Thanks

Gavin
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists



--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to