So now we have the first real lead. Next is for you to simplify your system to the point where you *can* understand the relationship between the pullf and pullx files. For example, I always suggest a water bath of explicit water with the sd integrator and apply the pull code to two waters.

It's time for you to bash your head against this one on your own until you can find a simple system that has no problem and then a slightly more complex system that has the problem. Bring those back to the list and we can help again if you can;t figure it out.

PS: you should file a bugzilla or otherwise try to get the gromacs list fixed so that you can post directly.

Chris.

Quoting alexander yakovenko <yakovenk...@ukr.net>:

 Sorry for mixing things, I do pull into N Y N direction and then
   performed umbrella simulation at Y Y Y for each distances window.
   This is very good question, actually I don't realize it too. The only
   thing what I can say is that I haven't edited/renamed these files,
   just copy them. So this is pure output of mdrun, hopes it knows what
   it writes... I can provide a tpr of a window for example so you can
   check couple first strings (for reproduction, I carried out all
   calculations on 8x xe...@2.66 workstations).
   Alex
   >

   First, you confuse me when you say "pulling direction was along
   Y-axis" since your .mdp file indicates pull_dim = Y Y Y and so you are
   pulling in *all* dimensions.

   Your profile doesn't look like mine at all, but then again I took mine
   from a force profile. Now that I can see your forces and
   displacements, I can't find any match between them. For example:
   cne...@cneale-desktop:~/work/August2010/integral/u10$ tail pullf_u10.xvg
   11982.0000      255.769
   11984.0000      332.586
   11986.0000      291.367
   11988.0000      264.031
   11990.0000      330.69
   11992.0000      336.757
   11994.0000      327.46
   11996.0000      475.078
   11998.0000      440.766
   12000.0000      342.814
   cne...@cneale-desktop:~/work/August2010/integral/u10$ tail pullx_u10.xvg
   11982.0000      3.05189 4.39188 -1.23643        2.03259 2.62201 3.35563
   11984.0000      3.12086 4.37951 -1.63297        1.98567 2.64212 -3.25943
   11986.0000      3.13274 4.37699 -1.57303        1.97354 2.64089 -3.32607
   11988.0000      3.13754 4.38542 -1.52275        1.94917 2.63444 -3.38366
   11990.0000      3.12712 4.38416 -1.61647        1.93608 2.63691 -3.29597
   11992.0000      3.11342 4.37694 -1.59735        1.95931 2.61705 -3.28952
   11994.0000      3.0957  4.384   -1.5691 1.99226 2.57634 -3.3149
   11996.0000      3.08384 4.38684 5.24141 2.00727 2.57168 -3.09875
   11998.0000      2.99618 4.41111 5.25558 2.08776 2.53869 -3.1227
   12000.0000      2.79826 4.41958 5.22444 2.29862 2.53084 -3.12472


   Can you explain to me how these can match up (with an equation please)?


   Quoting alexander yakovenko <   yakovenk...@ukr.net   >:

   > Yep, it was mistake with a sign, is
> http://picasaweb.google.ca/117558205101329348732/G_wham#5511351478636719042
   > looks like your one? Btw my temperature was 310K.
   > The dollars you would lost (as I used only 1 mdp for all runs via
   > script and thus avoiding humans mistakes like with pictures) is
   > probably because complicated landscape - the dissociation is coupled
   >  to (partial) unfolding and relative sub-domains shift (actually
   > this  experiment is aimed to support this hypothesis). I.e. it does
   > not  look too suspicious for me; something closer to manual was
   > expected  though. Anyway I attach logs from all my simulations and
   > the mdp.
   > As for box, it has 10x16x7 edges and pulling direction was along
   > Y-axis to bring molecules only 5.5nm apart (DNA and protein of ~2 nm
   >  radii) so there is definitely sufficient distances.
   > Anyway the only bug in g_wham is an explanation I can give to
   > ABSOLUTELY flat line of PMF profile.
   > As for colors, can we please stick on windows ids instead? I guess
   > you told about w4, w6 and w8 so I attached their logs from mdrun and
   >  for w10 too.
   > P.S. I still not understand if there is a way to make g_wham working
   >  for me (suggesting all other calculations were made fairly)?
   > Alex
   >




--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to