It depends on how you generated your error bars and how different your
two setups were other than different numbers of water. Xavier's
suggestion to split the sampling in half and report each half to the
list remains an important piece of data for us to have.
Also, please don't reply to the entire digest. Instead, cut and paste
the relevant text.
Chris.
-- original message --
Hi Xavier,
Ok, it would be better to talk with the average values together with the
corresponding error bars. For the system having smaller number of water
molecules the minimum of the PMF was around -4.31+-0.97 kJ/mol, and for the
other system it was around -1.75+-1.05 kJ/mol. Therefore, the difference is
significant.
Regards
--
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
