Yanmei Song wrote:
Dear Justin:
I really appreciate your response and help!
I am confusing about the result by using this method. I found in B.
Hess's paper (Appendix, JCP, 116, 2002) that " this gives a standard
error estimate for 1/eta of 29.5. "; and the error he gives for that eta
is 0.006. I thought the error should be calculated as 1/29.5=0.034.
Thank you again for your help!
The relationship is not a simple inversion as you've shown it. That is,
(standard error of 1/eta) != 1/(standard error of eta). The standard error
calculation depends on a number of factors, hence all the math in the Appendix
:) An example is given in Fig. 8 of that paper.
-Justin
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
