Hi,
Some months ago I reported a strange conflict between the GMX 4 new option 
nblist=-1 and tabulated potentials. At that time I contacted Berk and he could 
run my test system without any problem. So I thought I had something wrong for 
my system configurations. However, recently I re-checked the problem and found 
I got similar issues from two different software/hardware configurations. It 
seems the problem is sort of general. I'm wondering if any developer or people 
who are familiar with the code can help me to figure out the problem.
The problem is like the follows. When I use nblist=-1 option with tabulated 
nonbond interation, sometimes I got a segmatation fault. I used nonebond tables 
with space 0.004 nm and I smoothed the curves so no complain of wrong numerical 
derivatives from GMX were found. I tested the simulation on three machines:
A: Intel i7 gcc 4.1.2
B: Intel Xeon icc 10.1
C: AMD Barcelona icc 10.1
All tests were done using one CPU core. It seems system A/B always gave me 
troubles and C was fine.
I first used rlist =1.3 and rvdw=1.2 to give a 0.1 buffer. And I found the 
potential energys from A/B were weired with values sometimes as 1.0e29. And the 
potential energy with C is always around 1.0e3. When I set rlist=1.28, I can 
optimize the "Average neighborlist lifetime" about 11, as Berk onece suggested. 
But in this buffer size, simulations with A/B got segmentation fault 
immediately. Interestingly, I tried to try many conventional force field 
simulations/CG simulations with tabulated potentials before with A/B, and all 
of them seemed to be fine if I didn't use nblist=-1 with tabulated potentials.
Can anyone give me any suggestions?
Thanks,
Lanyuan
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
约会说不清地方?来试试微软地图最新msn互动功能!
http://ditu.live.com/?form=TL&swm=1
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to