Hi Mark,
I did not have the statement "periodic_molecules = yes" in the .mdp
files. I only had the statement "pbc=xyz" in the .mdp files.
So, I added the "periodic_molecules = yes" statement to the .mdp files
and ran the simulation again. However, this did not appear to resolve
the problem as I received the same warning.
Please advise.
Darrell
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:56:48 +1000
From: Mark Abraham <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] 1-4 interaction between atoms in PBC mode
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Message-ID: <4ab723b0.6040...@anu.edu.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Darrell Koskinen wrote:
Dear GROMACS-ians,
I have created an infinite graphene sheet and upon running grompp, I get
the following response:
/Warning: 1-4 interaction between 10085 and 10445 at distance 19.679
which is larger than the 1-4 table size 1.000 nm
Warning: 1-4 interaction between 9244 and 9963 at distance 19.553 which
is larger than the 1-4 table size 1.000 nm
These are ignored for the rest of the simulation
This usually means your system is exploding,
if not, you should increase table-extension in your mdp file
These are ignored for the rest of the simulation/
I assume that atoms from opposite ends of the simulation box are being
seen by GROMACS as being 1-4 neighbors as a result of the PBC, but the
shortest distance between the atoms is not being observed. Is this the
problem? Is this problem resulting in the system exploding? And, how do
I resolve this problem?
Did you use periodic_molecules = yes in your .mdp file?
Mark
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
