Mark wrote:
> xiao shijun wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> Recently, I met a problem on the force-field. I am doing something
>> on the calcium carbonate, and want to simulation it with gromacs.
>> The shell model for oxygen has been emploied in my system. When I
>> considered the non-boned potential associated with interactions between
>> atoms
>> in the same CO3 group, I only need to take O-O buckingham interaction
>> into account, but any electric interaction. How could I realize that in
>> my .top file.
>> First, I tried to use [pairs] to eliminate electric interaction, but
>> I can't add the buckingham interaction of O-O because there is no
>> buckingham
>> options for LJC14. I want to know if anyone of you have such the
>> experience. Thanks!!
>Usually you would not define a nonbonded interaction for atoms that
are
>so close together, since their interaction should be able to be
modelled
>adequately with the C-O bond and O-C-O angle (and perhaps with
CHARMM,
>an interaction harmonic the O-O distance as a Urey-Bradley term).
Thanks for Mark's suggestion. But I want to reproduce the simulation from
the other paper,
The paper describe the force-field that O-O nonbonded interaction in the
same carbonate should be considered.
In addition to that, I can't use buckingham potential in [pairs], even
choose funct = 2. I am wondering
if I want to describe 1-4 interaction by Buckingham, what could I do?
BEST
Shijun XIAO
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
