Your problem is unrelated to the bug. Something in your system is crashing;
this is a commonly-reported problem (search the archives).
Your system only contains three atoms?
-Justin
Inon Sharony wrote:
(Thanks, Justin)
I'm using GMX 4.0.4 compiled in double-precision. I perform an
equilibrating run, which goes well (300K). Then I perform a cooling run
which is identical except that one of the atoms is coupled to a bath at
0K, where I get the following error message:
Source code file: nsgrid.c, line: 357
Range checking error:
Explanation: During neighborsearching, we assign each particle to a grid
based on its coordinates. If your system contains collisions or parameter
errors that give particles very high velocities you might end up with some
coordinates being +-Infinity or NaN (not-a-number). Obviously, we cannot
put these on a grid, so this is usually where we detect those errors.
Make sure your system is properly energy-minimized and that the potential
energy seems reasonable before trying again.
Variable ci has value -2147483648. It should have been within [ 0 .. 216 ]
In response to the suggestion within the message, my tiny three-atom
molecule is optimized to a force of 1E-9.
I also turned off Dynamic Load Balancing, in the hope that this might
help, but alas...
Any thoughts on what I might be doing wrong, and how I could check for
it/them?
--
Inon Sharony
ינון שרוני
+972(3)6407634
atto.TAU.ac.IL/~inonshar
Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this
e-mail.
Quoting "Justin A. Lemkul" <jalem...@vt.edu>:
>
> Hi Inon,
>
> Berk implemented the fix for the release of version 4.0.2; it has
> been fixed for quite some time.
>
> The bugzilla entry is #229 if you would like to read the details of
> the problem and the solution.
>
> -Justin
>
> Inon Sharony wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Justin!
>>
>> Just wondering - do you know whether the problem with Range Checking
>> got corrected somehow?
>>
>> I checked the bugzilla but found no report of your bug.
>>
>> My system's energy minimized to a force of 1E-9, so I don't think
>> that's where my problem is...
>>
>> I understand that I might disable Dynamic Load Balancing to fix this
>> or somehow get around the Domain Decomposition (I don't know how to
>> do the latter). How did you deal with the problem?
>>
>> (There was also some talk about barostats, so I just want to make
>> sure that you know I'm not using one)
>>
>> --
>> Inon Sharony
>> ינון שרוני
>> +972(3)6407634
>> atto.TAU.ac.IL/~inonshar
>> Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing
>> this e-mail.
>>
>
> --
> ========================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul
> Ph.D. Candidate
> ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
> Department of Biochemistry
> Virginia Tech
> Blacksburg, VA
> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>
> ========================================
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
