Or rather than modifying the .top use tpbconv with an index file to generate a new .tpr

Tom

--On Wednesday, April 01, 2009 21:15:34 -0400 "Justin A. Lemkul" <jalem...@vt.edu> wrote:



Dayle Smith wrote:
Thanks for your help, Justin. I ran gmxcheck -c topol.tpr ("12284 atoms
in file") and gmxcheck -f traj.xtc ("# Atoms  29"). The difference is

Indeed, that's the problem, then!

the SOL atoms. I made another .tpr file with xtcgroups = TDR SOL, and
now gmxcheck shows that the number of atoms in topol.tpr is 12284, but I
still can't get g_covar to work. Maybe these are unrelated problems, I'm
not sure.

You haven't really changed anything.  The xtc-grps parameter defines what
was saved in the simulation.  Setting it after the fact does not affect
the already-produced .xtc file.  What you need is a .tpr file that
contains only TDR, so you would have to make modifications to your .top
in order to generate this TDR-only .tpr file.

-Justin

~Dayle

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Justin A. Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu
<mailto:jalem...@vt.edu>> wrote:



    Dayle Smith wrote:

        Hi Tsjerk,
        Thank you for your quick and helpful response. I defined
        "xtc_grps  = TDR" in my .mdp file (then I use grompp -f
        mdpme.mdp -c confout.gro -p topol.top -o topol.tpr -np 8 -n
        index.ndx, index contains TDR and SOL) and run it with -np 8.
        I'm afraid that I don't understand what "shuffling" or "matching
        series" refers to (a clue that I'm doing something wrong).  This
        g_covar error message is probably another clue:

        WARNING: number of atoms in tpx (29) and trajectory (29) do not
        match
        -------------------------------------------------------
        Program g_covar, VERSION 3.3.3
        Source code file: nrjac.c, line: 129
        Fatal error:
        Error: Too many iterations in routine JACOBI

        So the # of atoms is the same, but some other key ingredient
        doesn't match. Can you please enlighten me?!


    I think the output error message is bizarre, but you still have a
    number of atoms in the .tpr that does not match the .xtc.  If your
    simulation is of TDR and SOL, then those groups will be in your
    topol.tpr.  If your xtc-grps specify only TDR, then there will be a
    coordinate mismatch.  Run the following:

    gmxcheck -c topol.tpr
    gmxcheck -f traj.xtc

    and see if gmxcheck reports the same number of atoms in both files.
     This is the quickest way to know for sure.

    -Justin


        Thanks a lot,
        Dayle





        On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Tsjerk Wassenaar
        <tsje...@gmail.com <mailto:tsje...@gmail.com>
        <mailto:tsje...@gmail.com <mailto:tsje...@gmail.com>>> wrote:

           Hi Dayle,

           Errm, really, the only cases I know of this error to occur is
        when I
           had a mismatch between the reference and trajectory. Did you
        specify
           xtc-groups? Did you shuffle the system? How did you assert
        that you
           have matching series? Have you tried using the reference and
           the trajectory to convert (part of) the trajectory to .pdb and
        visualize?
           If all else fails, can you send (a link to) an archive
        containing a
           single frame from the trajectory and the reference?

           Cheers,

           Tsjerk

           2009/4/1 Dayle Smith <daylemariesm...@gmail.com
        <mailto:daylemariesm...@gmail.com>
           <mailto:daylemariesm...@gmail.com
        <mailto:daylemariesm...@gmail.com>>>:

            > Greetings---
            > I'm working with a DNA system, and all of the routines I've
           worked with that
            > require Jacobi diagonalization (g_covar, g_rms, etc) fail
            > with
           the "Too many
            > iterations in routine JACOBI" error. I'm using
        gromacs-3.3.3 with
           ffamber99
            > on the NCSA Mercury cluster. I've searched the archives,
        and I've
           found
            > several entries in which users are advised to check that
            > the
           coordinates in
            > the trajectory and structure files match (mine do). I've
            > also
           tried running
            > covariance analysis on a small ligand molecule, and I get
            > the
           same error. I
            > can get g_covar to work with -nofit, but then I can't run
        g_anaeig.
            >
            > I'm eagerly looking forward to your suggestions!
            >
            > Have a great day,
            > Dayle Smith
            > Department of Physics
            > Whitman College
            >




--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



----------------------
TJ Piggot
t.pig...@bristol.ac.uk
University of Bristol, UK.

_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to