Hello,
the system I'm referring at is an already equilibrated one. Before, I had
already made steepest descents.
You are correct that I have non-bonded interactions at distances that are more
than cut-off+table ext distance. I used to put table ext very bin in contrast
to my box. My system box was something less than 5nm before and table-ext was
5nm at the time. Now that I simulate a much bigger system than before (in one
dimension 6 times bigger), I realized that I had to increase also this
parameter.
Since this parameter affects only the pairs interactions I do not see the
reason why my simulations are affected by it, even if it is already big enough
(5nm in a 30nm box). My pairs interactions are (should) not (be) more that 1nm
far away.
I had extensively tested this parameter in gromacs 3, and I saw that it affects
the pairs interactions only. So I decided to increase it very much and not
bother with it.
Is there any difference in newest versions? Does it affect anything more?
Thank you,
Nikos
--- Berk Hess <g...@hotmail.com> schrieb am Mi, 4.3.2009:
Von: Berk Hess <g...@hotmail.com>
Betreff: RE: [gmx-users] How to overcome Fatal error of bonded interactions
Gromacs 4.0.3
An: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
Datum: Mittwoch, 4. März 2009, 9:23
#yiv174728022 #yiv779874946 .hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;padding:0px;}
#yiv174728022 #yiv779874946 {
font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}
Hi,
Your solution seems to indicate that your system is unstable.
My guess is that your system was not well equilibrated and at some point
some non-bonded interactions were at a distance of more than cut-off+tab_ext.
That would make your system explode. In that case increasing tab_ext to 2 nm
should also suffice.
Berk
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 08:33:52 -0800
From: lastexile...@yahoo.de
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] How to overcome Fatal error of bonded interactions Gromacs
4.0.3
Hello,
this has to do with my personal experience of using Gromacs version 4.0.3. So
this is not an
official response.
The story:
While I was trying to run an NVT simulation in a monoclinic box I encountered
the following problem:
Fatal error:
25 of the 336080 bonded interactions could not be calculated because some atoms
involved moved further apart than the multi-body cut-off distance (0.895 nm) or
the two-body cut-off distance (0.895 nm), see option -rdd, for pairs and
tabulated bonds also see option -ddcheck
and the:
Not all bonded interactions have been properly assigned to the domain
decomposition cells
Trying to put aside the fact that my system had any bug I found in the net the
following:
http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-developers/2008-January/002373.html
In order to overcome this error I increased the value of
table-extension = 30
in my mdp file in such a way, as to be bigger from my biggest dimension I had
in my system. The ran proceeded (until now that I'm writing this e-mail)
without any problem.
This value has to do with the cut-off of pairs1-4 LJ interactions and is
calculated in nm.
JFYI
Regards,
Nikos
See all the ways you can stay connected to friends and family
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
