Hi, gmx-users, Recently I have try to use AMBER 9 for the simulation of protein with about 300 residues. Surprisingly, I found that AMBER is far slower than GROMACS; GROMACS is about twice faster. I can not figure out the reason. Why is GROMACS faster than AMBER? Could anybody know the reason?
Or have I made a mistake in AMBER or GROMACS simulation? If anybody has compared the speed of AMBER and GROMACS, please tell me the result. Thank you~ -- -------------------------------------------------- 'God used beautiful mathematics in creating the world.' -Paul Dirac 'But he created too many object.' -Seungpyo Hong Seungpyo Hong Master student at PBIL(Protein BioInformatics Lab.) in KAIST, Daejeon Korea Tel. (82)-18-372-2468 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
