> Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 23:42:28 +1000> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 
> gmx-users@gromacs.org> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] PVT-simulation> > Jiang ran 
> wrote:> > Hello everybody,> > > > Thank you all for your suggestions ,> > I 
> red the Gromacs software package manual  but  found that PVT was not > > 
> implemented yet in the Gromacs software  package.  I want to conserve > > 
> both volume and pressure because my professor says that they are both > > 
> important for the dynamics of the protein. > > I don't think you can set up a 
> non-trivial ensemble where both pressure> and volume are constant, and even 
> if you can, no force fields have been> parameterized for it because there's 
> no physical system in which it is> true. Consider an ideal gas in such an 
> ensemble. PV = nRT, so with P, V> and n constant, then T is also constant, 
> which means your gas molecules> can only interact in a way such that kinetic 
> energy is constant.> > Now for constant n and V you could define negative 
> feedback algorithm> that returned P to a reference pressure, which will force 
> T to vary> inversely. What's the point in doing that?> > > So I would like to 
> start > > implementing it for the weekend.> > I head the idea to introduce 
> langevin dynamics on the  atoms close to > > the boundary so the magnitude of 
> the random force satisfy the > > fluctuation dissipation theorem, however the 
> net inwarded direction of > > the total force on each plane will be solved 
> with a set of langrance > > multipliers such that the net inwarded force on 
> the plane gives the > > correct reference pressure  such that  
> P_ref=-sum(F_plane)/A . In this > > way both volume as pressure are 
> conserved. In which file of the gromacs > > software package I can best start 
> implementing it ?> > I started looking in mdrun.c however this didn't make 
> much sence to me.> > There's no shortcut possible here, as I said some other 
> time in the last> week. Start with the main function and follow through a 
> typical> calculation - even use a debugger to make life easy on yourself. 
> Learn a> bit about how gromacs works by running a simulation with it first.> 
> > Mark> _______________________________________________> gmx-users mailing 
> list    gmx-users@gromacs.org> 
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users> Please search the archive 
> at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!> Please don't post 
> (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the > www interface or send it to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Can't post? Read 
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.phpThank you for your 
> suggestion,>Consider an ideal gas in such an ensemble. PV = nRT, so with P, 
> V>and n constant, then T is also constant, which means your gas molecules>can 
> only interact in a way such that kinetic energy is constant.Dear mister 
> Abraham,Thank you for suggestion and very good theory, However I don't 
> understand your theory. An ideal gas is a hypothetical gas consisting of 
> identical particles of zero volume, with no intermolecular forces  So which 
> interactions do you mean ? They do make perfect collisons with wall (which 
> don't exist in pbc...right ??).Therefor in my case the only "interactions" 
> are with the infinite external temperature, pressure bath (random forces), 
> which make sure of the fact that the  kinetic energy and pressure are 
> constant as the friction term is balancing the random force (fluctuation 
> dissipation theorem), so I really don't see the need of a negative feedback 
> algorithm here.I was thinking as the langevin forces are external they don't 
> play a role in virial. The forces between ideal gas atoms can either be zero 
> or infinite. Therefor the internal viral can not be defined for an ideal gas 
> in the first place. According to clausius the total viral has now to be equal 
> to the kinetic energy tensor. As kinetic energy is known the total virial is 
> kown too. The external viral is known (random forces), however the internal 
> viral could not be defined in first place.   Is this a paradox ? Thank you 
> for nice helpfull discussion,greetingsRan Jiang 
_________________________________________________________________
News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now!
http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to