Jones de Andrade wrote:
Hi
The future xml format will be great. And no, cause I can always links my
fortran codes to C routines... It's just "ugly".
Thanks for the clue in grompp.c file. :)
Now that you've mentioned, why couldn't I use the .tpr files? Shouldn't
it be like reading the .xtc files, written by a C written program?
Cause it seems that the .tpr will have the data in a more compact and
definitive way, instead of the possibility of thousands of reads due to
the include files.
Even so, the worst that could happen would be to use the grmacs C
routines to read the .tpr file. Could you tell me which files should I
look at, in this case?
Thanks a lot in advance!
src/gmxlib/tpxio.c
The problem is that there are complicated data structures which are hard
to map to fortran.
--
David.
________________________________________________________________________
David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://folding.bmc.uu.se
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
