This is the matrix that I obtain. CYS1 CYS1 CYS5 CYS5 VAL6 CYS10 CYS10 N1 SG4 N27 SG30 C38 N55 SG58
   CYS1     SG4   0.302
   CYS5     N27   0.988   0.900
   CYS5    SG30   1.070   0.917   0.333
   VAL6     C38   1.498   1.396   0.510   0.585
  CYS10     N55   1.122   0.901   0.614   0.609   0.835
  CYS10    SG58   0.879   0.655   0.490   0.422   0.857   0.322
  CYS15     N87   0.784   0.488   1.066   0.984   1.477   0.774   0.620
  CYS15    SG90   0.477   0.202   0.960   0.961   1.432   0.823   0.625
  CYS17    N100   1.030   0.784   0.721   0.460   1.004   0.617   0.387
  CYS17   SG103   1.224   1.039   0.514   0.204   0.625   0.621   0.487
  VAL21    C138   0.756   0.685   0.408   0.388   0.847   0.812   0.531
  CYS22    N140   0.657   0.574   0.404   0.432   0.887   0.742   0.458
  CYS22   SG143   0.755   0.588   0.371   0.430   0.827   0.436   0.203
  VAL29    C196   0.132   0.394   1.117   1.193   1.626   1.248   1.004


                CYS15   CYS15   CYS17   CYS17   VAL21   CYS22   CYS22
                    N87    SG90    N100   SG103    C138    N140   SG143
  CYS15    SG90   0.320
  CYS17    N100   0.661   0.767
  CYS17   SG103   1.017   1.056   0.412
  VAL21    C138   0.933   0.802   0.602   0.569
  CYS22    N140   0.836   0.686   0.594   0.612   0.133
  CYS22   SG143   0.701   0.606   0.533   0.568   0.419   0.321
  VAL29    C196   0.854   0.555   1.137   1.345   0.869   0.777   0.886

I still have the problem.

The not formed S-S is between CYS1 (first residue of my peptide) and
CYS15. The problem appear only when I add an additional bond between
the N of CYS1 and the C of VAL29 (my last aa) to introduce the cyclic form.
The protonated CYS is number 15.

this is my specbond.dat file:

6
CYS    SG    1    CYS        SG    1    0.2    CYS2    CYS2
CYS    SG    1    HEME    FE    2    0.25    CYS2    HEME
CYS    SG    1    HEME    CAB    1    0.2    CYS2    HEME
CYS    SG    1    HEME    CAC    1    0.2    CYS2    HEME
HIS    NE2    1    HEME    FE    1    0.2    HIS1    HEME
CYS    N      1        VAL    C    1    0.14    CYS2    VAL

when I replace number 6 with 5, the three disulphide bonds are then formed well. (??????)

David van der Spoel wrote:
Giacomo Bastianelli wrote:
Hi Tsjerk,

the distance of the "not formed" S-S is 0.202
while the two "formed" S-S are 0.204 and 0.203.
Therefore, gromacs should recognize all three and
create the SS bonds.

CYS    SG    1    CYS    SG    1    0.2    CYS2    CYS2

this is the second line of my specbond.dat


please check the output of pdb2gmx, in particular the distance matrix, and report it back to the list (completely) if there are problems.


_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to