Mark Abraham wrote:
Qiao Baofu wrote:
Hi all,

After running a MD of a system with about 17000 atoms, I calculated the potential and the total-energy:

*************************************************************************************
Last frame read 1557952 time 1557.952

Statistics over 1557953 steps [ 0.0000 thru 1557.9520 ps ], 2 data sets

Energy Average RMSD Fluct. Drift Tot-Drift ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Potential -273047 626.559 611.258 -0.305998 -476.731 Total-Energy -184656 839.662 828.307 -0.305999 -476.731 *************************************************************************************

I found that the Fluct./Average is 0.45% (Total-Energy), 0.22%(Potential). In the simulation, the time step is 0.001ps, and I saved the energy every step. On the other hand, on page 98 of the book "Computer Simulation of Liquids" (M. P. Allen & D. J. Tildesley), it is said "For a simple Lennard-Jones system, fluctuation of order 1 part in 10^4 are generally considered to be acceptable."

This book was written nearly 20 years ago, so take with a "grain of salt" its advice on "general acceptability".

Was this a simple Lennard-Jones system? If not, you are comparing apples and oranges anyway.

The book is fine, but limited to LJ systems. Therefore Mark's question is important.


The ratio obtained from Gromacs are quite bigger. Therefore, I want to know if there are any standard for different system to check whether the system are accetable or not.


PS: Another question: I found only when the energy data are divided by the number of the molecules, the obtained result are consistent with the date in some related papers. In Gromacs, the unit of energy is KJ/mol. If divided by the number of molecules, how to consider the unit?

kJ/mol per molecule? :-P

The conversion is straightforward, but you may find it easier conceptually to convert your other sources into kJ/mol.

You can divide by the number of molecules using g_energy -nmol.
The reason GROMACS doesn't do it for you is that it is well defined only for monomolecular systems. The energy you get is hence kJ/mol system. Where system is your complete system, be it 125 argon atoms or a large biological complex.



Mark
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--
David.
________________________________________________________________________
David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,          75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:  46 18 471 4205          fax: 46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED]       [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to