David M.,

Thanks for the suggestions.  About the Yu et al. error bars:

> For Yu et 
> al., the first number is the average from the full 5 ns simulation and 
> the number in () is for the last 2 ns.

If not for the CE23Me case, I would probably assume that the discrepancy due to 
doing a notoriously difficult type of calculation with different methods.  
Considering CE23Me, that still may be the case but it has me more concerned.

>
> Here is the comparison:
>
> 2,3,6-methylcellononaose
> =============================
> JDM-Run1        487 ± 130 kJ/mol
> JDM-Run2        463 ± 26 kJ/mol
> Yu et al.       393 (329) kJ/mol
>
> CE236Me
> =============================
> JDM-Run1        113 ± 39 kJ/mol
> JDM-Run2        121 ± 15 kJ/mol
> Yu et al.       224 (165) kJ/mol
>
> CE23Me
> =============================
> JDM-Run1        -3.4 ± 23 kJ/mol
> JDM-Run2        16 ± 16 kJ/mol
> JDM-Run3        19 ± 10 kJ/mol
> Yu et al.       136 (136) kJ/mol
>
> CE6Me
> =============================
> JDM-Run1        70 ± 15 kJ/mol
> JDM-Run2        79 ± 9 kJ/mol
> Yu et al.       68 (50) kJ/mol

Thanks,
Jonathan

____________________________
Jonathan Moore, Ph.D.
Research and Engineering Sciences - New Products
Core R&D
The Dow Chemical Company
1702 Building, Office 4E
Midland, MI 48674  USA
Phone:  (989) 636-9765 
Fax: (989) 636-4019
E Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to