I request you to see section 5.3.3 . Under the [ atomtypes ] section displayed over there I want to replace c6 and c12 by buckingham potential. I want to replace O-O LJ interaction with O-O Buckingham interaction.
 
Just below that the manual shows [ nonbond_params ] where I think I can change the function type from 1 to 2 to use Buckingham potential. However that does not seem to work as the software takes LJ interaction parameters from the [ atomtypes ] section itself. I got no change in my results when I did that.

 Any idea as to what can be wrong?
-
Karamyog.

On 6/1/06, Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
karamyog singh wrote:
> Is it not possible to use Buckingham potential instead of default LJ
> potential for interaction between same atoms?

Read the manual. Section 4.1 would be a good start.

Mark
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to