Am Mo., 27. Dez. 2021 um 16:25 Uhr schrieb Nikhil Ladha <[email protected]>:
> > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 7:24 PM Michael Böhm <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Am Mo., 27. Dez. 2021 um 14:04 Uhr schrieb Nikhil Ladha < >> [email protected]>: >> >>> Hi Michael >>> >>> I think you are hitting a similar issue like this one >>> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/3066. >>> If so, the fix for the same is under review and could be available in >>> the next release. >>> >> >> Thanks for your reply. I saw that issue and thought it doesn't really >> apply to me cause i don't use striping (only Replicate and one >> Distributed-Replicate). But maybe, if this is a cause for the mismatched >> cksum, it could be the root cause >> > > Yes, the missing stripe count from the volfile after the upgrade is > causing the checksum mismatch and hence the "peer-rejected" issue. > Aah i see - i subscribed to the issue to keep track when this is potentially resolved. > > >> I always hesitate to upgrade to a x.0 version - but as those holidays are >> the best time for these upgrades i thought i might skip v9 this time. >> >> To close this for me, as i have a lot of updates to do and this was one of the prequisites, i downgraded the host to v9.4 and this didn't cause any errors. I will now upgrade all other nodes to 9.4. As the release schedule changed with v10 and the world we live in atm is generally slowing everything down i hope to stay on a maintained v9 until late next year - and that's totally fine with me.
________ Community Meeting Calendar: Schedule - Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
