I think there also a mistake with SDRAM-2 and DDR2-SDRAM (do not forget DDR is DDR-SDRAM actually).
Hope this will be "fixed" soon (but this is not the only problem I've seen), because we migh have to add DDR3 as well as XDR next year maybe :) another list of things to be updated : - OS : Windows XP, 2003 (+ longhorn ?) (let sysadmin add their own flavor of linux, there is so much of them... deb, rh, mdv, suse, yd, (k)ubuntu, etc...) - network iface : GigE (1000base T) - processor : remove 386/486, maybe P1, 68040, and 1 AMD Athlon (seen twice). add AMD 64, Opteron, P4 EM64T compatible, PowerPC G5, Sempron, and maybe Cell soon :) - device_gfxcard : there NO gfx card in PCI-X. do not mix PCI-X and PCI-Express :) and I think it's time to remove ISA gfx card ;) - device-drive : SATA is IDE, like PATA :) Even if almost everybody consider IDE as PATA, IDE is the hard drive technology, and Parallel-ATA or Serial-ATA the transfert technology (like SCSI and LVD/HVD...) So : remove SATA, only keep IDE, SCSI, USB. Add firewire 400 and 800 drives ? - device-hdd : this is the transfert technology. So must have : Parallel-ATA, Serial-ATA, LVD/HVD and the older for scsi, USB, firewire 400/800 - device-case : add desktop, and maybe rack/pedestal nicodache, hardware lover ^^ On 5/18/05, Marco Gaiarin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I see that ram type are only EDO, DDR, SDRAM, SDRAM-2. > > I think that are missing at least: > > + ``Normal'' (non edo, non fpm, non ECC) > + FPM > + ECC/Registered (but this is an attribute, there's out there EDO ECC > and non EDO ECC...) > + DIMM > + SODIMM > + RAMBUS > > Also, AFAIK DIMM and DDR are both SDRAM, so i've not really understood > the classification, i suppose. > > I think that a better classification would be: > > + at the name field, the ``form factor'': SIMM 30pin, SIMM 72pin, > DIMM, SODIMM, DDR, RAMBUS, ... > + at the type, the ``subtype'': Normal, EDO, FPM, ECC, Registered, > SDRAM, ... > (with the same note, ECC are an attribute of EDO and SDRAM at > least...) > + at the speed/freq the real ones (60ns, PC133, PC2700, ...) > > I've not clear another thing. We keep the RAM as example. > > If on a computer i add two RAM type, eg: > > Desc: DIMM type: SDRAM freq: PC100 > Desc: DIMM type: SDRAM freq: PC133 > > and on computer view i add some RAM, i can choose from two entries DIMM > that seems equal. > I have to ``overload'' the description as: > > Desc: DIMM PC100 type: SDRAM freq: PC100 > Desc: DIMM PC133 type: SDRAM freq: PC133 > > this are intended? I'm missing something? > > Many thanks. > > -- > dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 > Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.sv.lnf.it/ > Polo FVG - Via della Bontà , 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN) > gaio(at)sv.lnf.it tel +39-0434-842711 fax +39-0434-842797 > > Per favore, aiutate gli Stati Uniti a salvarsi dai brevetti sul > software, salvando innanzitutto voi stessi. > http://punto-informatico.it/p.asp?i=52786&p=2 > > _______________________________________________ > Glpi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/glpi-dev >
