milenkovicm commented on issue #17297:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17297#issuecomment-3217961595

   Edited issue description with another option: 
   
   Another alternative would be to have a configuration option, like 
`datafusion.execution.local_cache` which would decide should it use current 
cache logic or return new logical plan element like `LogicalPlan::Cache { id: 
string, lineage: LogicalPlan }`
   
   ``` rust 
   pub async fn cache(self) -> Result<DataFrame> {
      if `datafusion.execution.local_cache` == true {
        let context = 
SessionContext::new_with_state((*self.session_state).clone());
        // The schema is consistent with the output
        let plan = self.clone().create_physical_plan().await?;
        let schema = plan.schema();
        let task_ctx = Arc::new(self.task_ctx());
        let partitions = collect_partitioned(plan, task_ctx).await?;
        let mem_table = MemTable::try_new(schema, partitions)?;
        context.read_table(Arc::new(mem_table))
     } else {
      let lineage = self... // get current logical plan from df up to this point
      Ok(
        LogicalPlan::Cache(Cache { id : uuid(), lineage)  
      )
     }
   }
   ```


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to