mbutrovich commented on PR #1623: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1623#issuecomment-2786751017
> @mbutrovich How can I improve this test to expose current known issues around INT96 handling? The big thing is generating a timestamp that's larger than a 64-bit nanosecond timestamp can represent. I think that generator uses int64 to offset from a base date. If we make sure to add about 1000 years to the base date that should be plenty to generate timestamps that when written as INT96 by Spark will not read back into a 64-bit nanosecond timestamp correctly. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
