mbrobbel opened a new pull request, #14480: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14480
## Which issue does this PR close? None. ## Rationale for this change With the MSRV > 1.80 we can use `std::sync::LazyLock` instead of `once_cell::Lazy`. ## What changes are included in this PR? Remove `once_cell` dependency from `datafusion-physical-plan` and replace use of `once_cell::Lazy` with `std::sync::LazyLock`. ## Are these changes tested? CI. ## Are there any user-facing changes? Datafusion crates no longer depend directly on `once_cell`. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
