andygrove opened a new issue, #2101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/2101

   ### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
   
   The `tpch` benchmark binary already writes a machine-readable JSON summary 
with `--output`, but two gaps make it awkward to use for tracking performance 
across refs:
   
   1. **Results are lost when a query fails.** Both the `ballista` and 
`datafusion` run loops only write the summary *after* the whole loop, and a 
failing query aborts the run (`?`/`.unwrap()` on `ctx.sql`/`collect`). So a 
single failure — or an out-of-memory `SIGKILL` at a large scale factor — 
discards every result collected so far. This is easy to hit at SF1000.
   
   2. **There is no built-in way to compare two runs.** Comparing a baseline 
against a candidate (per-query delta, totals, row-count agreement) has to be 
done by hand or with an out-of-tree script.
   
   ### Describe the solution you'd like
   
   - Persist the summary JSON after **every** query (atomically), so a killed 
run keeps completed results.
   - Record a failed query with an `error` message plus whatever iterations 
completed, and continue to the remaining queries; still exit non-zero if any 
query failed.
   - Add a `tpch compare <baseline.json> <candidate.json>` subcommand that 
diffs two runs query-by-query: fastest iteration per side, delta, delta %, 
suite totals, and row-count agreement.
   
   ### Additional context
   
   Complements the benchmarking guide added in #2075 by making the numbers that 
page records reproducible and comparable. Related to #1630.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to