gemini-code-assist[bot] commented on PR #37529:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/37529#issuecomment-3857402765

   ## Summary of Changes
   
   Hello @AMOOOMA, I'm Gemini Code Assist[^1]! I'm currently reviewing this 
pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a 
summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
   
   This pull request addresses flakiness in two distinct test suites within the 
Apache Beam Python SDK. It refines the model cost estimation logic in the model 
manager tests to ensure consistent behavior and updates a shared resource tag 
in the multi-process utility tests, both aimed at improving test reliability.
   
   ### Highlights
   
   * **Model Manager Test Refinement**: Simplified cost calculation logic in 
`model_manager_test.py` by removing a redundant `load_cost` variable and 
directly using `model_cost` for allocation and assertion, which likely resolves 
a source of test flakiness.
   * **Multi-Process Shared Test Tag Update**: Updated a tag name from 'basic' 
to 'main' for a `MultiProcessShared` instance in 
`multi_process_shared_test.py`, addressing potential flakiness or naming 
inconsistencies.
   
   🧠 **New Feature in Public Preview:** You can now enable **Memory** to help 
**Gemini Code Assist** learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code 
reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. **Click 
[here](https://codeassist.google/code-review/login) to enable Memory in your 
admin console.**
   
   <details>
   <summary><b>Changelog</b></summary>
   
   * **sdks/python/apache_beam/ml/inference/model_manager_test.py**
       * Removed the `load_cost` variable and updated its references to use 
`model_cost` directly within the 
`test_single_model_convergence_with_fluctuations` method.
       * Modified the `noise` calculation in the same test to align with the 
simplified cost logic.
   * **sdks/python/apache_beam/utils/multi_process_shared_test.py**
       * Changed the `tag` argument for a `MultiProcessShared` instance from 
`'basic'` to `'main'` in the `test_unsafe_hard_delete_autoproxywrapper` method.
   </details>
   
   
   
   <details>
   <summary><b>Activity</b></summary>
   
   * The author, AMOOOMA, created this pull request to fix flakiness in tests.
   * No specific human activity (comments, reviews, or progress updates) has 
been recorded in the provided context.
   </details>
   
   
   <details>
   <summary><b>Using Gemini Code Assist</b></summary>
   <br>
   
   The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our [documentation 
page](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code),
 here are some quick tips.
   
   <b>Invoking Gemini</b>
   
   You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment 
using either `/gemini <command>` or `@gemini-code-assist <command>`. Below is a 
summary of the supported commands on the current page.
   
   Feature | Command | Description
   --- | --- | ---
   Code Review | `/gemini review` | Performs a code review for the current pull 
request in its current state.
   Pull Request Summary | `/gemini summary` | Provides a summary of the current 
pull request in its current state.
   Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, 
both in pull request comments and review comments.
   Help | `/gemini help` | Displays a list of available commands.
   
   <b>Customization</b>
   
   To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository 
maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review 
style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a 
`.gemini/` folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be 
found 
[here](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/customize-gemini-behavior-github).
   
   <b>Limitations & Feedback</b>
   
   Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances 
where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 
:thumbsup: and :thumbsdown: on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're 
interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code 
Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up 
[here](https://google.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_2cyuGuTWsEw84yG).
   
   <b>You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code 
reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the [Gemini Code Assist IDE 
Extension](https://cloud.google.com/products/gemini/code-assist).</b>
   </details>
   
   
   
   
   [^1]: Review the [Privacy Notices](https://policies.google.com/privacy), 
[Generative AI Prohibited Use 
Policy](https://policies.google.com/terms/generative-ai/use-policy), [Terms of 
Service](https://policies.google.com/terms), and learn how to configure Gemini 
Code Assist in GitHub 
[here](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/customize-gemini-behavior-github).
 Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and [use code with 
caution](https://support.google.com/legal/answer/13505487).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to