> > I don't really like that this repository knows how to build Geany and G-P. > > A developer might make changes in that area and might become unable to > > proceed because he can't get CI to work as the job needs to be adapted. > > A realistic example: we might want to switch to the meson build by default > > (or maybe only for specific platforms) and the PR to implement would be > > unable to fix the CI. > > We should probably just provide the Docker image itself and not the scripts > > to build Geany or packages. > > Agreed. We could move builders/scripts/build_mingw64_geany_plugins.sh and its > companions to the Geany resp. G-P repos. Will try once I find time for it.
Done. The scripts to build Geany and Geany-Plugins are now in their respective repositories. This required to create https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3315 but it was on my TODO anyway. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/infrastructure/pull/7#issuecomment-1279984590 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/infrastructure/pull/7/[email protected]>
