Hi Junio,

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > diff --git a/merge-recursive.h b/merge-recursive.h
> > index d415724..340704c 100644
> > --- a/merge-recursive.h
> > +++ b/merge-recursive.h
> > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ struct merge_options {
> >             MERGE_RECURSIVE_THEIRS
> >     } recursive_variant;
> >     const char *subtree_shift;
> > -   unsigned buffer_output : 1;
> > +   unsigned buffer_output : 2; /* 1: output at end, 2: keep buffered */
> >     unsigned renormalize : 1;
> 
> Once a field ceases to be a boolean, it is OK not to squish it into
> a bitfield like this for a struct that we will have only a very
> small number of instances of.  Treating it just like "verbosity",
> which occupies a whole int even though it can only get up to 5 or
> so, would be more appropriate.

I changed it to an int.

Thanks,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to