On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Pranit Bauva <pranit.ba...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> And why are the defines 1,2,4,8 ?
>>> It looks as if a #define bitmap may be a better choice here ?
>>> How do we do these kind of bit-wise opions otherwise ?
>
> We might want to ask if these should even be bitwise option. A word
> with individually controllable bits (i.e. "flag word") makes sense
> only when the bits within it are largely independent. But the code
> does this pretty much upfront:
>
>>>> + if (term_defined != 0 && term_defined != TERM_BAD &&
>>>> + term_defined != TERM_GOOD && term_defined != TERM_NEW &&
>>>> + term_defined != TERM_OLD)
>>>> + die(_("only one option among --term-bad, --term-good, "
>>>> + "--term-new and --term-old can be used."));
>
> which is a very strong indication that these bits are not.
>
> I suspect that OPTION_CMDMODE would be a better choice to group
> these four options and mark them mutually incompatible automatically
> than OPT_BIT?
I must say that Pranit used that at one point, but it felt weird to me
to use that for things that is not really a command.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
