Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: > Otherwise, we'll have to skip the test, perhaps with something like the > patch below. I suspect the problem is actually the size of "unsigned > long", not time_t, as we use that internally for a bunch of time > computation.
We should probably be using int64_t for time calculations; "unsigned long" is 32-bits on 32-bit x86 systems. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
