Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
> Since d1c5f2a (Add git-am, applymbox replacement., 2005-10-07), i.e. for
> almost 11 years already, we used a male form to describe "the other
> tree".
This actually is older than that commit by 9 commits. I may have
said it already, but it originates at 47f0b6d5 (Fall back to
three-way merge when applying a patch., 2005-10-06).
> While most likely unintended, this gave the erroneous impression as if
> the Git developers thought of users as male, and were unaware of the
> important role in software development played by female actors such as
> Ada Lovelace, Grace Hopper and Margaret Hamilton. In fact, the first
> professional software developers were all female.
>
> Let's change those unfortunate references to the gender neutral "their
> tree".
I'd add this at the end.
Doing so would also make the fallback_merge_recursive(),
which is an oddball, more in line with the other parts of
the system where we contrast what we have vs what we obtain
from others with "ours" vs "theirs". This inconsistency was
also unintended.
I do not think changing these references to "her" and keep them like
so for 11 years is a proper way to show "respect" anyway, by the
way, so this round is a definite improvement over that version.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
