On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:14:42PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:21:26AM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote: > > > >> > diff --git a/combine-diff.c b/combine-diff.c > >> > index f39be434..a20caa80 100644 > >> > --- a/combine-diff.c > >> > +++ b/combine-diff.c > >> > @@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@ static struct diff_filepair *combined_pair(struct > >> > combine_diff_path *p, > >> > pair->one[i].path = p->path; > >> > pair->one[i].mode = p->parent[i].mode; > >> > oidcpy(&pair->one->oid, &p->parent[i].oid); > >> > - pair->one[i].sha1_valid = > >> > !is_null_oid(&p->parent[i].oid); > >> > + pair->one->oid_valid = !is_null_oid(&p->parent[i].oid); > >> > >> Is this transformation correct? > > > > Or the oidcpy() above it, which was introduced in patch 3. > > Indeed these look wrong.
Yes, those do look wrong. I'll figure out where I went wrong when I reroll. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
