On 06/04/2016 01:40 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes: > >> On 06/03/2016 11:33 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> [...] >>> Ah, that reminds me. What's the doneness of the dependent topic? >> [...] > > What I meant was the doneness of mh/split-under-lock actually.
I don't know of any open issues or unaddressed feedback in split-under-lock. I've gone over the code many times myself and am pretty confident about it. I just reviewed the series again, and one thing that I wasn't so happy about was that it makes many changes to the ref transaction error-handling code, but that code is not very well tested (and the content of the error messages is not really tested at all). So I just submitted another patch series to add more tests in this area [1]. Those tests turned up a couple of cosmetic problems but nothing serious. So as far as I know, this series is ready to go. But it is a big and rather intricate change to an important area of the code, so I hope it can get merged early in the next release cycle to get wider testing. Michael [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/296626 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
