Mike Hommey <m...@glandium.org> writes: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 02:48:28PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> So, even if we agree that per-port behaviour is not something we >> would use if we were building the system without any existing users >> today, I do not think we want "git now fails with an error" at all. >> It goes against the approach Git takes to give smooth transtion to >> users when we must break backward compatibility. > > I don't disagree. I went with a hard fail because it was easier. I'm > not too keen blocking this series on this transition happening. So I'll > try to finish this series without this change, and we can separate this > transition discussion from the rest of the connect.c changes.
Yeah, I was thinking about the same thing as a short-term direction. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
