Junio C Hamano wrote: > Encouraging use of "send-email" with "--patience" is a losing > approach if your goal is to present more reviewable diff, isn't it? > Using "send-email" as if it is a front-end of "format-patch" means > you lose the opportunity for the final proof-reading (not just > finding typoes in the message, but the shape of diff, like you are > pointing out). > > Using "format-patch --patience" or some other diff option, and pick > the best one to give to "send-email" would indeed be a way to do so.
It's a matter of taste. My flow is "send-email-only", I do as much as possible in-tree, and when I notice something to do during "git send-email", I just abort and retry. So "Oops, looks ugly, I'll try with another option" is OK in this flow. > What is happening is that Antoine's patch (which is slightly > different from what you quoted above) has trailing whitespace after > "setup_path();" Nice catch! -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
