Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes:
>> I am NOT suggesting to make this enhancement in the prototype to
>> allow us experiment with submodule selection use case, but this is
>> an obvious place to allow
>>
>> :(label=A B):(label=C D)
>>
>> to mean ((A & B) | (C & D)) by making item->labels an array of set
>> of labels.
>
> This is what already works with the series. Or rather:
>
> ":(label=A B)" ":(label=C D)"
>
> works as you would expect for (A&B) | (C&D).
That is "duplicationg path". I was envisioning a single
":(label=A B):(label=C D)tediously/long/path/because/java/"
a shorter and sweeter way to say your two pathspec variant, i.e.
":(label=A B)tediously/long/path/because/java/" \
":(label=C D)tediously/long/path/because/java/"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
