Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: >> >>> @@ -199,6 +203,7 @@ static struct submodule >>> *lookup_or_create_by_name(struct submodule_cache *cache, >>> submodule->update_strategy.command = NULL; >>> submodule->fetch_recurse = RECURSE_SUBMODULES_NONE; >>> submodule->ignore = NULL; >>> + submodule->labels = NULL; >> >> Hmph, is there a reason to do this, instead of embedding an instance >> of "struct string_list" inside submodule structure? >> >> I am not yet claiming that embedding is better. Just wondering if >> it makes it easier to handle initialization as seen in the hunk >> below, and also _clear() procedure. > > Thanks for pointing out that alternative. That looks so much > better in this patch. Let's see how the follow up patches develop. > As we'd not check != NULL first, but check against the count of the > string list. (I expect no problems down that road though).
I also wonder if we can say the same for the .ignore field, by the way, if we agree that it is a better direction to go. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
