Yaroslav Halchenko <y...@onerussian.com> writes:

> On Fri, 06 May 2016, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
>> Dear Git Folks,
>
>> Originally this issue was mentioned in previous thread [1], and I have 
>> decided
>> to bring it into a separate thread.  ATM there is a dichotomy in git behavior
>> between cloning non-bare repos:  if I clone over ssh or just locally by
>> providing url without trailing /.git, git senses for /.git and works just 
>> fine
>> with ssh or local repositories, but fails for "dummy" http ones, the demo
>> script is here [2] which produces output listed below.  From which you can 
>> see
>> that  cloning using http URL to the repository without /.git fails (git 
>> version
>> 2.8.1, Debian).  As it was noted in [1], concern could have been to not
>> traverse website since could lead to dangerous places.  But .git is under
>> originating url directory, as well as info/ or HEAD or any other object
>> accessed by git, so IMHO this concern is not a concern.

I am afraid that the reason why you saw no response is primarily
because nobody is interested in extending dumb commit-walker HTTP
transport after the world has largely moved on and abandoned it.

The necessary update to the client might as simple as using
$GIVEN_URL/.git/ and attempting the request again after seeing the
probe for $GIVEN_URL/info/refs fails.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to