Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes:

> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes:
>>>
>>>>> I wonder if the patches mentioned have something to do with the "git
>>>>> add deep/in/the/tree" that fails to notice deep/in/ is an unrelated
>>>>> repository in some way?
>>
>> The same functionality is added in 8745024 (parse_pathspec: support
>> stripping/checking submodule paths - 2013-07-14) so if it didn't fail
>> to notice that before 5a76aff1a6 and did after, it's a bug.
>
> The bug seems to have existed before. However in the bug we are talking
> about the nested repo is not a submodule yet.

That agrees with Duy's recollection below:

>> I vaguely recall this symptom. It has something to do with the index,
>> the check we do requires a gitlink in the index, I think. So if the
>> gitlink entry is not in the index, our protection line fails.

So are we all on the same page that this is a bug now?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to