On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote:
> Stefan Beller <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> instead of filtering afterwards, i.e. each strbuf_add is guarded by
>> an
>>
>> if (is_interesting_output(...))
>> strbuf_add(...)
>
> That's a good approach.
>
> The implementation gets a bit trickier than the previous one, but it
> would look like this. Discard 2/3 and 3/3 and replace them with
> this one.
>
> The external interface on the input side is no different, but on the
> output side, this version has "expected '%s', got '%s'" error, in
> the same spirit as the output from "test_cmp", added in.
>
> Instead of checking the entire output line-by-line for each expected
> output (in case you did not notice, you can give --expect='quiet: 3'
> --expect='abbrev: 7' and both must match), this one will check each
> output line against each expected pattern. We wouldn't have too
> many entries in the variable dump and we wouldn't be taking too many
> --expect options, so the matching performance would not matter,
> though.
>
>
> t/t0040-parse-options.sh | 1 +
> test-parse-options.c | 88
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t0040-parse-options.sh b/t/t0040-parse-options.sh
> index dbaee55..d678fbf 100755
> --- a/t/t0040-parse-options.sh
> +++ b/t/t0040-parse-options.sh
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ Standard options
> -v, --verbose be verbose
> -n, --dry-run dry run
> -q, --quiet be quiet
> + --expect <string> expected output in the variable dump
>
> EOF
>
> diff --git a/test-parse-options.c b/test-parse-options.c
> index b5f4e90..e3f25df 100644
> --- a/test-parse-options.c
> +++ b/test-parse-options.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,61 @@ static int number_callback(const struct option *opt, const
> char *arg, int unset)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int collect_expect(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int
> unset)
> +{
> + struct string_list *expect;
> + struct string_list_item *item;
> + struct strbuf label = STRBUF_INIT;
> + const char *colon;
> +
> + if (!arg || unset)
> + die("malformed --expect option");
> +
> + expect = (struct string_list *)opt->value;
> + colon = strchr(arg, ':');
> + if (!colon)
> + die("malformed --expect option, lacking a colon");
> + strbuf_add(&label, arg, colon - arg);
> + item = string_list_insert(expect, strbuf_detach(&label, NULL));
> + if (item->util)
> + die("malformed --expect option, duplicate %s", label.buf);
> + item->util = (void *)arg;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +__attribute__((format (printf,3,4)))
> +static void show(struct string_list *expect, int *status, const char *fmt,
> ...)
> +{
> + struct string_list_item *item;
> + struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> + va_list args;
> +
> + va_start(args, fmt);
> + strbuf_vaddf(&buf, fmt, args);
> + va_end(args);
> +
> + if (!expect->nr)
> + printf("%s\n", buf.buf);
> + else {
> + char *colon = strchr(buf.buf, ':');
> + if (!colon)
> + die("malformed output format, output lacking colon:
> %s", fmt);
> + *colon = '\0';
> + item = string_list_lookup(expect, buf.buf);
> + *colon = ':';
I have been staring at this for a good couple of minutes and wondered if this
low level string manipulation is really the best way to do it.
(It feels very C idiomatic, not using a lot of Gits own data
structures. I would have
expected some sort of skip_prefix just with partial regular expression or a
string_list_split_in_place for the splitting. But this "set and reset *colon"
seems to be optimal here)
> + if (!item)
> + ; /* not among entries being checked */
> + else {
> + if (strcmp((const char *)item->util, buf.buf)) {
> + printf("expected '%s', got '%s'\n",
> + (char *)item->util, buf.buf);
> + *status = 1;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + strbuf_reset(&buf);
strbuf_release ?
> +}
> +
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> const char *prefix = "prefix/";
> @@ -46,6 +101,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> "test-parse-options <options>",
> NULL
> };
> + struct string_list expect = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
> struct option options[] = {
> OPT_BOOL(0, "yes", &boolean, "get a boolean"),
> OPT_BOOL('D', "no-doubt", &boolean, "begins with 'no-'"),
> @@ -86,34 +142,38 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> OPT__VERBOSE(&verbose, "be verbose"),
> OPT__DRY_RUN(&dry_run, "dry run"),
> OPT__QUIET(&quiet, "be quiet"),
> + OPT_CALLBACK(0, "expect", &expect, "string",
> + "expected output in the variable dump",
> + collect_expect),
> OPT_END(),
> };
> int i;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> argc = parse_options(argc, (const char **)argv, prefix, options,
> usage, 0);
>
> if (length_cb.called) {
> const char *arg = length_cb.arg;
> int unset = length_cb.unset;
> - printf("Callback: \"%s\", %d\n",
> - (arg ? arg : "not set"), unset);
> + show(&expect, &ret, "Callback: \"%s\", %d",
> + (arg ? arg : "not set"), unset);
> }
> - printf("boolean: %d\n", boolean);
> - printf("integer: %d\n", integer);
> - printf("magnitude: %lu\n", magnitude);
> - printf("timestamp: %lu\n", timestamp);
> - printf("string: %s\n", string ? string : "(not set)");
> - printf("abbrev: %d\n", abbrev);
> - printf("verbose: %d\n", verbose);
> - printf("quiet: %d\n", quiet);
> - printf("dry run: %s\n", dry_run ? "yes" : "no");
> - printf("file: %s\n", file ? file : "(not set)");
> + show(&expect, &ret, "boolean: %d", boolean);
> + show(&expect, &ret, "integer: %d", integer);
> + show(&expect, &ret, "magnitude: %lu", magnitude);
> + show(&expect, &ret, "timestamp: %lu", timestamp);
> + show(&expect, &ret, "string: %s", string ? string : "(not set)");
> + show(&expect, &ret, "abbrev: %d", abbrev);
> + show(&expect, &ret, "verbose: %d", verbose);
> + show(&expect, &ret, "quiet: %d", quiet);
> + show(&expect, &ret, "dry run: %s", dry_run ? "yes" : "no");
> + show(&expect, &ret, "file: %s", file ? file : "(not set)");
>
> for (i = 0; i < list.nr; i++)
> - printf("list: %s\n", list.items[i].string);
> + show(&expect, &ret, "list: %s", list.items[i].string);
>
> for (i = 0; i < argc; i++)
> - printf("arg %02d: %s\n", i, argv[i]);
> + show(&expect, &ret, "arg %02d: %s", i, argv[i]);
>
> return 0;
return ret; ? Otherwise `ret` is unused.
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
