Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes:

> When giving more than just pathspec arguments (e.g. submodule labels),
> we need a way to check all non-matching arguments for the pathspec parsing
> if these are the submodule labels or typos.
>
> This patch prepares for that use case by splitting up `report_path_error`
> into a new checking function `unmatched_pathspec_items` and a
> reporting callback.

I seem to recall that there is a longstanding plan to move the
"seen[]" array that is separate and outside from the pathspec
structure into the pathspec structure.  Wouldn't that be a more
sensible approach to solve the same thing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to