On 24 Apr 2016, at 13:50, SZEDER Gábor <sze...@ira.uka.de> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <sze...@ira.uka.de>
> ---
>
> As far as I can tell after eyeballing the test script, this was the
> only case where the &&-chain was broken.
>
> t/t9824-git-p4-git-lfs.sh | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t9824-git-p4-git-lfs.sh b/t/t9824-git-p4-git-lfs.sh
> index 0b664a377c45..64f8d18216d4 100755
> --- a/t/t9824-git-p4-git-lfs.sh
> +++ b/t/t9824-git-p4-git-lfs.sh
> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ test_expect_success 'Add big files to repo and store
> files in LFS based on compr
> # We only import HEAD here ("@all" is missing!)
> git p4 clone --destination="$git" //depot &&
>
> - test_file_in_lfs file6.bin 13 "content 6 bin 39 bytes
> XXXXXYYYYYZZZZZ"
> + test_file_in_lfs file6.bin 13 "content 6 bin 39 bytes
> XXXXXYYYYYZZZZZ" &&
Thanks! I believe I remember some script/flag to detect broken &&-chains.
Do I imagine that or can anyone point me to it?
Thanks,
Lars
> test_file_count_in_dir ".git/lfs/objects" 1 &&
>
> cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
> --
> 2.8.1.99.g5d5236f
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
