Luke Diamand <l...@diamand.org> writes: > One thing I wondered about is whether this should be enabled by > default or not. Long-time users of git-p4 might be a bit surprised to > find their git commits suddenly gaining an extra Job: field.
Ahh, I didn't even wonder about but that is not because I didn't think it matters. Does this change affect reproducibility of importing the history from P4, doesn't it? Would that be a problem? How common is it to have the "extra" Job: thing in the history on P4 side? If the answer to this question is "on rare occasions and only when there is a very good reason to have 'jobs' associated with the changelist", then the 'might be a bit surprised' brought by this change can probably be explained away as "a fix to a (design) bug that used to discard crucial information" that (unfortunately) have to change the resulting Git object names. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
