On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:47 AM, David Turner <dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote:
>> > + fd = unix_stream_connect(socket_path);
>> > + if (refresh_cache) {
>> > + ret = write_in_full(fd, "refresh", 8) != 8;
>>
>> Since we've moved to unix socket and had bidirectional communication,
>> it's probably a good idea to read an "ok" back, giving index-helper
>> time to prepare the cache. As I recall the last discussion with
>> Johannes, missing a cache here when the index is around 300MB could
>> hurt more than wait patiently once and have it ready next time.
>
> It is somewhat slower to wait for the daemon (which requires a disk
> load + a memcpy) than it is to just load it ourselves (which is just a
> disk load).
You forgot the most costly part, SHA-1 verification. For very large
index, I assume the index-helper is already in the middle of hashing
the index content. If you ignore index-helper, you need to go hash the
whole thing again. The index-helper can hand it to you if you wait
just a bit more. This wait time should be shorter because index-helper
is already in the middle of hashing (and in optimistic case, very
close to finishing it).
--
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
