Pranit Bauva <pranit.ba...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> Pranit Bauva <pranit.ba...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Current implementation of parse-options.c treats OPT__QUIET() as integer >>> and not boolean and thus it is more appropriate to print it as integer >>> to avoid confusion. >> >> There is no "confusion" factor involved, as we do not use native >> "boolean" type in our C code. IIUC, the reason why we want to do >> this is because we may want to see how it would affect the value of >> the underlying variable to give multiple --quiet options from the >> command line, which is a policy issue (i.e. we want to allow >> commands to react to multiple quiet options differently), not an >> implementation one (i.e. "current implementation happens to use >> integer"). >> >> We would want to see how multiple --quiet options affect the >> value of the underlying variable (we may want "--quiet --quiet" >> to still be 1, or we may want to see the value incremented >> to 2). Show the value as integer to allow us to inspect it. >> >> perhaps? > > This commit message does look a lot better. I will re-roll this.
You need to pick which one you want inside the (parentheses), though. After reading 3/6 I am guessing that that you wanted the latter. > Should I just send an update of this patch or the whole series? The latter, for a series this small. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
