santi...@nyu.edu writes:
> From: Santiago Torres <santi...@nyu.edu>
>
> This change is meant to prepare verify_tag for libification. Many
> existing modules/commands already do the refname to sha1 resolution, so
> should avoid resolving the refname twice. To avoid breaking
> builtin/verify-tag, we move the refname resolution outside of the
> verify_tag() call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Santiago Torres <santi...@nyu.edu>
> ---
> builtin/verify-tag.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/verify-tag.c b/builtin/verify-tag.c
> index 1ca9a05..7a7c376 100644
> --- a/builtin/verify-tag.c
> +++ b/builtin/verify-tag.c
> @@ -42,25 +42,23 @@ static int run_gpg_verify(const char *buf, unsigned long
> size, unsigned flags)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int verify_tag(const char *name, unsigned flags)
> +static int verify_tag(const unsigned char *sha1, unsigned flags)
> {
> enum object_type type;
> - unsigned char sha1[20];
> char *buf;
> + char *hex_sha1;
> unsigned long size;
> int ret;
>
> - if (get_sha1(name, sha1))
> - return error("tag '%s' not found.", name);
> -
> + hex_sha1 = sha1_to_hex(sha1);
> type = sha1_object_info(sha1, NULL);
> if (type != OBJ_TAG)
> return error("%s: cannot verify a non-tag object of type %s.",
> - name, typename(type));
> + hex_sha1, typename(type));
So, if I said
$ git verify-tag master
the code used to take "master" from argv[], fed it to verify_tag()
as parameter 'name', turned it to the object name of the commit,
noticed that it is not a tag, and complained that "master: cannot verify".
With this rewrite, the same invocation would cause "master" to be
turned into the object name, which is passed to verify_tag() and the
complaint is an overlong
76bece327f490cb344b95ae8f869cbeb89a4d20b: cannot verify a non-tag object of
type commit
That does not sound like a good change at all.
If you want to support a future caller of a libified version of
verify_tag() that has a raw object name but not the original name,
I'd suggest to make this function keep parameter 'name' while adding
the new parameter 'sha1'. Then, the error reporting may become:
return error("%s: cannot verify a non-tag object of type '%s'",
name ? name : sha1_to_hex(sha1), typename(type));
and the output would still be useful. Further improvements may be
- rename 'name' to 'report_name' to clarify that the parameter is
only used for reporting, and that the tag object to verify is
always identified by the new 'sha1' parameter.
- use find_unique_abbrev() to shorten the fallback name displayed
in the error message.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
