Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > Torsten Bögershausen <tbo...@web.de> writes: > >> If we had made the CRLF -> LF conversion, yes. But we don't do that. >> crlf_to_git() returns without touching the line endings. > > That sounds quite broken. How would a user ever fix broken data in > the index then? I know the commit that often appears in these > discussions claims to give us "safer CRLF" handling, but I have a > suspicion that perhaps we should rethink if that claim is really > true. Isn't it giving us more problems than it is worth?
Having said all that, within the context of the current codebase where autocrlf refuses to do the conversion, I agree that teaching blame to follow the same logic makes sense. Let me review the series up to 6/7 with fresh eyes. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
