Hi Paul, On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Paul Tan wrote:
> diff --git a/t/perf/p3404-rebase-interactive.sh > b/t/perf/p3404-rebase-interactive.sh > new file mode 100755 > index 0000000..aaca105 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/t/perf/p3404-rebase-interactive.sh > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ > > [...] > > +test_perf 'rebase -i --onto master^' ' > + git checkout perf-topic-branch && > + git reset --hard perf-topic-branch-initial && > + GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR=: git rebase -i --onto master^ master > +' This measures the performance of checkout && reset && rebase -i. Maybe we should only test rebase -i? Also, I would strongly recommend an extra test_commit after reset; Otherwise you would only test the logic that verifies that it can simply fast-forward instead of cherry-picking. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
