Duy Nguyen <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote: >> So what do we want to do for the upcoming release? > > I don't know. Befoire 2.8.0, all three matching cases are broken. With > the current changes on 2.8.0, one case is fixed with the other cases > broken. I guess it can create even more confusion. Yeah documentation > helps a bit. > >> I am OK to leave >> the code as-is for now and describe it as a known bug that is still >> being worked on (as long as it indeed is being worked on, that is), > > I do want to fix it. I don't know how much code is impacted yet (and > how many more bugs I'll be introducing while attempting to fix it). It > may take a few cycles before the fix can be released.
Sorry, but I should have been more clear. At this point in the release cycle, I do not think it is an option to pile on more "fixes" to risk destabilizing the end-user experience even more before 2.8.0 final happens. It is between (1) the current code is good enough that with a (temporary) limitation clearly described in the documentation users can work around the implementation deficiency and get a benaviour that is closer than 2.7.2, or (2) the half-way implementation we have does not give enough advancement toward the final goal (i.e. the !dir re-inclusion behaves consistently with the dir that ignores the whole thing underneath, while allowing subpaths ignored with follow-on entries in the same .gitignore file), and we are better off reverting the whole thing to go back to 2.7.2 behaviour, planning to do a better job in the next cycle. I was hoping that (1) would be the case. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
