Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > Maybe we want to remove the struct child_process from the > function signature of the callbacks and callbacks need to rely on > the data provided solely thru the pointer as passed around for > callback purposes, which the user is free to use for any kind > of data.
I think that is the most sensible. > As a rather quickfix for 2.8 (and 2.7) we could however just > breakup the finish_command function and call child_process_clear > after the callbacks have run. That would not fix the case where run_command() fails, clears child and then start failure callback, no? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
